How does URAC assess compliance during the accreditation process?

The correct choice reflects the comprehensive approach URAC takes to assess compliance during the accreditation process. URAC employs both documentation reviews and on-site surveys to gather a thorough understanding of an organization's practices, policies, and adherence to the established standards.

Documentation reviews are essential because they provide a written account of an organization's operations, ensuring that policies and procedures align with URAC's criteria for accreditation. By examining documentation such as quality assurance plans, operational protocols, and compliance records, URAC can verify that an organization meets specific benchmarks and maintains a consistent level of care.

On-site surveys complement this by allowing URAC evaluators to observe processes in real-time, engage with staff, and assess the environment in which services are delivered. This direct observation helps confirm that the documented policies are not only in place but are also actively practiced and effective in ensuring quality and compliance.

Together, these two methods form a robust framework that allows URAC to effectively assess an organization's compliance with accreditation standards, thereby ensuring that a high level of quality is maintained in healthcare service delivery.